Rheumatoid Arthritis and the Acadmic

Research – Do you incorporate research into your disease management? If you do explain how and what difference it has made. If not discuss why not. Help us understand any barriers you have experienced to using research about Rheumatic Disease.

I'm - among other things - an academic. I did a studio based visual arts degree, and followed that up with a masters in art history and curating at the University of Adelaide. So my natural inclination, when faced with anything new, is to research it. It's just how I operate... Naturally, when it comes to my RA, I don't do anything different...

It HAS lead to some quite amusing situations, over the years. Some time ago - a long time actually - while the disease was still relatively mild, I was struggling to deal with rising levels of chronic pain, even though the disease wasn't progressing very fast. Then, while at the physiotherapist having some work done on dodgy wrists - I was at art school at the time, so that was impacting my ability to work quite significantly. My then physio had a very holistic approach to her discipline - BIG TIP...look for people like that to have on your team - and included a lot of body work (AKA massage) into her treatments, which not many physios ordinarily do. Working up my arms, she commented on the knots of muscle spasms in my forearms, then found the same in my upper arms. Thoroughly intrigued, she checked out my legs and found more in my calves and thighs.

We were both quite puzzled, but ultimately, after then doing some evaluation of my grip strength, and observing how I was picking things up and putting them down, and getting up and down from sitting positions, and other normal daily movements, she said that the most likely cause was aggravation of the muscles that were being used in ways they weren't intended to be used, because I was using my muscle strength - which is still considerable - to compensate for joints that weren't working well. 

What happens, as they build up, is that the muscles themselves become much more painful, which puts more burden back on the joints, and then back again to the muscles, and so on - it's an entirely destructive dialogue that happens between my muscles and joints as I adapt the way I use my body to compensate for the deterioration in my joints. All leading to a need for more and more pain relief. Which is a rabbit hole I didn't want to go down back then, any more than I do now! So, I did some research...

Then I took myself to my GP - I needed to see her anyway, and then, with that business dealt with I said I wanted to ask her about Valium - Diazepam. It has a terrible rap here, having been over prescribed to too many women in the past to keep them 'calm' - rather than deal with the issues that had made them anxious in the first place... BUT, chemically, the drug is a muscle relaxant. I explained what the physio had found, and her thoughts on the situation. And I asked whether, given the Valium was a muscle relaxant, if a small dose of that would deal with my muscle spasms, which would then loosen their grip on my joints, and in doing so, ease the pain levels overall, and allow me to drop back the amount of painkillers I was using. I still remember the VERY long look she gave me... But then, after thinking about it, said that there was a definite logic to my idea, and prescribed me a single course of 5mg tablets, saying, "I don't know how much will make a difference, for this purpose, so you'll have to play around with it a bit to work it out for the longer term." Yep - take the Valium and go home and play with it!!! She'd been my GP for many years, and was well accustomed to me protesting AGAINST taking anything, so she knew I was highly unlikely to gobble them all up in five minutes. And she was also, obviously, going to monitor the situation. 

To this day, Diazepam is part of my medicine box. I take a 5mg tablet maybe twice a week, mostly. When I flare, and things start to seize, I'll add in another one until the flare settles again. I've not been all knotted up with muscle spasms since. So, my research paid off. I've continued to do my own research, taking things to my GPs and rheumatologists over the years when I've wanted to see what they think - if it involves something drug-based, or something that might be in conflict with my medications. 

The flip side of this is dealing with doctors' egos... The pathway to collaborative relationships with our doctors can be a rocky one. One of my criteria that's non-negotiable in my relationships with my doctors is that they see me as a partner in my ongoing treatment. If they're not prepared to work WITH me, then they're not the doctor for me. I'm an intelligent, highly educated individual, and I won't be 'doctored'... I ALWAYS ask questions as to why a particular treatment might be being suggested, and I expect to be given the basic courtesy of a clear answer, and the space to then discuss it among other possible options. 

While there have been definite improvements overall in the types of people being admitted to med schools - it's no longer just based on final school grades here in Australia; there's a rigorous interview process to enable the schools to evaluate whether potential candidates also have the temperament and right reasons for wanting to do medicine - it's not perfect, but it's better than just admitting anyone who scored high enough marks. The kind of intelligence required to study well, and do well in exams isn't all it takes to make a good doctor, as we all know! But there are still doctors out there with a god complex, who don't like to work collaboratively. I have encountered some of them...and it wasn't good. 

I have sero-negative RA. I've never shown a positive rheumatoid factor in my pathology. In a study published in the journal Rheumatology, in August 2016, it was estimated that 38% of RA patients are sero-negative. At the time I was diagnosed, I was given a figure of 20% by my first rheumatologist who, fortunately for me, was one doctor who was well aware of sero-neg RA, AND viewed it not as a milder form of the disease - as many still do - but a genuine variant that can be mild to severe, just as sero-ps RA is...and requiring a similar approach to treatment. In the intervening years between that doctor and the wonderful rheumy I had in Sydney, and my current one here (recommended by my Sydney doc), I've encountered many rheumatologists who have dismissed my initial diagnosis. 

One question I would ask, after finding that 38%, compared to the 20% I was given 26 years ago, is just how many UN-diagnosed people there were out there who DID have RA, and then received no treatment for how long? The mind boggles!

To be brutally honest, I find that very poor. I'm not medically trained. I don't have access to all the available research. And I can seek out what IS available and find enormous amounts of relevant info about sero-neg RA. For a rheumatologist NOT to do that speaks very poorly of the experience patients like me are likely to have when encountering them, and the anecdotal stories via support groups bear that out. It can take much longer for someone with sero-neg RA to be diagnosed, and that means delays in starting treatment, which puts the patient that much further behind the eight ball.

I'm an admin in an online support group for Australians with Autoimmune inflammatory disease. Most have RA in common, some have secondary AI diseases as well, and we have a range of people with different levels of severity. Some have other inflammatory AI diseases altogether. The thing I encourage ALL of them to do, particularly those newly diagnosed, is to start learning about their disease. Start doing the research. Start reading. Talk with those of us who've had AI diseases for a long time. Ask the questions. There's no such thing as a stupid question, and knowledge is power - to mash a couple of cliches together...! 

The reality for most of us is that we have to be our own advocates. To do that, we need to know what we're talking about. We have to do the research and learn about our diseases and treatments, and we need to have doctors who will work WITH us on our treatment long term. But, learn HOW to research. Seek out the government and education sites - the .gov, and .edu sites. Those with .com MAY have useful info, but remember, they are also a commercial site with a particular product to push, on the whole. In Australia, the website for The Australian Rheumatology Association has patient portals. You can download excellent PDFs about medications for free, information about different AI diseases, and they offer a 'find a rheumatologist' service as well. It's excellent. You can find them HERE. 

So if you're just starting out and are feeling overwhelmed and don't know where to look, start there. Information on the Mayo Clinic site - American - is solid too. It's written for the lay person, so it's also a good place to start. And there are others. But BEWARE Dr Google. DON'T try and diagnose yourself - that's a rabbit hole that's crazy making. That's what the doctors are for. 

At the end of the day, how much research an individual will do depends very much on how they operate. For me, it's a natural thing. About everything I'm curious about!